The trial was expected to run for weeks. It stopped dead. On 26 August 2026, Meta agreed to pay up to $18 billion to settle claims brought by almost every US state, which accused Facebook and Instagram of deliberately getting children hooked on their apps.

The agreement brings together 52 attorneys general β€” 48 states, Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, American Samoa and the Northern Mariana Islands. Around $17.6 billion goes to states and territories, with California taking the largest share ($2.2 billion), ahead of New York and Texas (over $1 billion each). Meta ends the case without admitting fault. Federal judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers still has to approve the deal.

$18bn maximum value of the settlement
52 attorneys general signed up
2 h daily cap for 13-17 year olds

What Meta has agreed to change

This is the concrete part, and by far the furthest Meta has ever gone. The measures will apply to teen accounts for ten years, in phases, between four and twelve months after judicial approval.

βœ… What changes

  • A two-hour daily cap, cumulative across the apps, that only a parent can change
  • Access blocked from midnight to 6 a.m.
  • Push notifications switched off during school hours
  • Likes and reactions hidden by default
  • Cosmetic-surgery filters off by default
  • Stronger age estimation, with external audits
  • Parent alerts: a first message to an adult, searches about suicide or eating disorders

❌ What does not change

  • Personalised recommendations remain the norm
  • Targeted advertising continues
  • Infinite scroll is untouched
  • So are disappearing messages
  • Livestreaming and gifting stay in place
  • The non-personalised feed is only an option to switch on

$5.3 billion hanging on TikTok and YouTube

The financial structure is unusual: a slice of the settlement, put at $5.3 billion, is only payable if TikTok and YouTube adopt equivalent protections of their own. Meta thereby avoids being the only platform throttling its teenage users while competitors carry on β€” and turns its legal settlement into leverage over the whole sector. Neither ByteDance nor Alphabet commented immediately.

"The problem is not the time, it's what fills it"

Child protection groups welcome a genuine step forward while pointing to the same limitation: the settlement acts on the duration of exposure, not on the engine that produces it.

Zvika Krieger, former director of Meta's responsible innovation team, notes that almost nobody changes default settings β€” and that many parents will simply never know these options exist. Arturo BΓ©jar, a former engineering director at the company, aims more directly at the recommendation system: a teenager may well put the phone down after two hours, but they put it down in exactly the state the app left them in, wanting to come back. The non-personalised feed, for its part, remains a box to tick.

Two hours a day of a product engineered to capture attention is still two hours a day of a product engineered to capture attention.
Meta logo

Meta Platforms β€” parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads. The settlement covers only Facebook and Instagram, and is binding only in the United States.

What about Europe?

Nothing, directly. This is a US legal settlement: it binds Meta in the United States only, and no parent in France, Spain or Belgium will see these limits appear on that basis alone. In practice, though, a company is unlikely to maintain two separate versions of its child protections β€” the history of the GDPR suggests the strictest standards tend to spread.

In Europe the lever remains regulatory: Article 28 of the Digital Services Act and the guidelines published by the Commission in July 2025 already call for private accounts by default, a reduction in features that drive compulsive use and, in some cases, age verification. In France, the law banning under-15s from social media was struck down by the Constitutional Council on 14 August 2026; a new draft is expected by spring 2027.

🧭 What a parent can take from this

A curfew and a timer treat the symptom. They change neither the feed, nor the recommendations, nor the advertising model that funds them β€” which is precisely what makes the app hard to leave. How much time is spent matters less than which tool we hand an 11 or 12-year-old.

Capaz made the opposite bet: an app designed for 8-14 year olds from the outset, with no algorithmic feed, no advertising, no infinite scroll and no strangers. There is no timer to set, because there is nothing pushing anyone to stay.

No timer, because there is nothing to stop

A messaging app built for 8-14 year olds: no algorithm, no advertising, no endless scroll.